I don't believe a word of it. Democracy? House arrest? Meeting presidents and Hillary Clinton!! Getting the Nobel peace prize!! Working for United Nations for two years!
Aung San Suu Kyi married Michael Vaillancourt Aris - and who is he?
Image: I inserted Niccolò Machiavelli because Suu Kyi is as much in on the Machiavellian intelligence as is the British Empire and the United Nations.
昂山素季 is chinese for Aung San Suu Kyi
A range of flags, only a few shown here, of Burma/Myanmar over the past years. In yellow square is current flag and emblem (Coat of Arms if you will). Here it is: State seal of Myanmar
New flag "lost" the peacock (peafowl) but the colors are the same as in pagan mystic relgions of Ishtar. (see below under Peafowl).
The Elders... yes, she is there too.
Yes, the peaccock is the giveaway - the tell-sign. Follow along to know who San Suu, Aung San Suu Kyi father, and herself really were/is.
During June 2012 ASS was travelling parts of Europe and she went to get her Nobel prize just as Henry Kissinger did. She also got a doctors degree at Oxford. As I saw her on television, the lying box, I saw she could hardly not smile and she had a hard time not laughing our loud. Speaking in London she even used George Bush's (the older) phrases.
Do you really think the elite would allow ASS inside the warmth if she was not part of a clandestine operation to fool you when the same elite uses riot police to shut you up in London and everywhere else?
A whole world has been deceived for hundred of years and especially since 1946 with regards to Myanmar and Aung San Suu Kyi. She (born 19 June 1945) and United Nations (The UN officially came into existence on 24 October 1945) were born at the same time.
Jesus depicted in a stained glass window in Rochester Cathedral, Kent.
Notice the white flag with red cross!
Aung San Suu Kyi went to such a school (church) when she was young while her father was fighting the British Empire! In essense a Catholic school.
"Jesus" looks like Charlemagne! First Emeror of the Holy Roman Empire the reincarnation of the Roman Empire.
When she was young she went to a Methodist Episcopal Church formerly called Methodist English High School but renamed to Basic Education High School No. 1 Dagon. Dagon was originally an Assyro-Babylonian fertility god who evolved into a major northwest Semitic god, reportedly of grain (as symbol of fertility) and fish and/or fishing (as symbol of multiplying). Which relates to the Mithraic mysteries adopted by the Holy Roman Empire and The Vatican.
It is told Aung San Suu Kyi is a Theravada Buddist! What on earth is a burmeese doing in a Christian school and why is she then a buddist!!?? East meets west perhaps. The Methodist English High School was only for the very rich and she was rich like a royal! The founder of Methodism, John Wesley, was an Anglican. Anglicanism is a tradition within Christianity comprising churches with historical connections to the Church of England or similar beliefs, worship and church structures. The word Anglican originates in ecclesia anglicana, a medieval Latin phrase dating to at least 1246 that means the English Church. Anyway, long story... she attended basically a Roman Empire Religious Church namely The Vatican's Catholism and she is Buddist! Holy Moses! At this point I would not trust her with a knife.
On the right I have loaded in a few flags! A few! Ha! The older flag the Golden Hintha flag (1300–1500) is green and contains a Hamsa bird (not a peacock). We could talk history for weeks just on the peacock. But please notice the similarities in the flags as they move on in history after 1752+.
There are just so many flags we could keep a class going for a year and never finish. However, please notice that Burma was occupied before and that by the British Empire. They used the Union Jack for this and later incorporated the peacock in a circle type style.
The latest flag is yellow, green and red with a white star. The coat of arms has a yellow star and The Roman Empire holy tree or crown. Same logo as The United Nations but here with Myanmar in the middle.
Aung San Suu Kyi is General Secretary for National League for Democracy
General Secretary is also the title of the United Nations. And she uses the same word "National". And "League" as in the older League of Nations
And color red for communism and white star and yellow peacock.
Star is symbol for 13 Tribes of Is Ra El or 13 familes of the Illuminati among on is Rothschild. Peacock is the symbol of goddess Ishtar.
Aung San Suu Kyi studied at St. Hugh's College and Oxford University in England. She is General Secretary of the National League for Democracy (please notice the peacock in the organisations flag). Does League of Nations ring some bells here? Nations and National almost same. In fact Nations is gentes in Latin. And Gentiles in Latin is the same spelling: gentes. So Nations means they are gentiles. But to what? To Israel naturally! Everything outside of Israel is gentile hence a nation until they surcome to the full force and power of Israel and what is under Is Ra El namely the 13 families called The Illuminati or whatever you want to call them. One of these families is the all mighty Rothschild family. If you want to see how the rich live and rink then visit joint venture between Robert Mondavi and Baroness Philippine de Rothschild producing a proprietary Bordeaux-style blend at Opus One: opusonewinery.com
So in essence Burma/Myanmar has been occupied for ages since The British Empire had it and later let go of it to The United Nations because that was around the same time British Burma (1945–1948) "lost" it. United Nations was set up at the same time namely The UN was founded in 1945 after World War II to replace the League of Nations. Wau - yea follow me?!
Enter Aung San Suu Kyi. She was born on June 19, 1945 in the city of Rangoon, Burma. Notice the year please. Same year as United Nations was born! They love dates and years. She was born into a rich family and father; General Aung San Kyi and mother; Daw Khin Kyi brought her into the world. Her father, General Aung Sun, was the national leader of Burma until his assassination on July 17, 1947.
She married Michael Vaillancourt Aris and had two children. Aris was born in Havana, Cuba. His mother, Josette, was the Canadian Ambassador's daughter, and his English father, John, was an officer with the British Council. Anthony, his identical twin, was head of Serindia Books, which specialised in scholarly accounts of Tibetan culture. Aris dies in 1999 - latimes.com.
Oh dear. So she married Aris who's father, John, was an officer with the British council. Married made in heaven. Now she was going to be the one introducing democracy! Well, I have news for you. There is no democracy neither in Myanmar nor elsewhere. Aung San Suu Kyi is a "british" agent working in full coorporation with the United Nations and the socalled house arrest and imprisonenment is probably in most part just endured to keep the whole charade going. Do you recall the 1963 movie Charade? "She would spend the next six years of her life at her lakeside villa in Rangoon to serve her house arrest." that sound very nice - almost better than a holiday. If I could follow her footsteps I don't believe she ever sat in prison for mor ethan 60 seconds while the photographers were present!
You have to be really evil to win a Nobel Peace Prize.
Aung San Suu Kyi got one too as did Henry Kissinger.
Bogyoke (General) Aung San, Suu Kyi father, Killed by the British Empire. Then she marries an englishman named Michael Vaillancourt Aris. Vaillancourt is keyword.
He was a founder of the Communist Party of Burma and was instrumental in bringing about Burma's independence from British colonial rule in Burma, but was assassinated six months before its final achievement.
Bogyoke Aung San with Clement Attlee, 10 Downing Street, January 1947.
Aung San created Oway magazine Peacock's Call but not a word to be found. You would think Aung San Suu Kyi might have a copy? He was a founder of the Communist Party of Burma and was instrumental in bringing about Burma's independence from British colonial rule in Burma, but was assassinated six months before its final achievement.
"Q: Who do you think really killed Bogyoke Aung San? A: Who really killed Bogyoke Aung San was the British government. It was their plot. Q: Why do you say that? A: I suppose there were three reasons why he was killed. Firstly, Bogyoke Aung San was the leader who could organise and unite the whole country so they were afraid of the whole of Burma uniting. This was the main reason. Secondly, Bogyoke Aung San could reunite with the Communist Party of Burma. They were worried about that too. And finally, they supposed that they could handle Burma more easily if they removed him. These were the reasons why he was killed." -source
"A recent release of classified documents from British Foreign office regarding the assasination of Aung San has prompted an investigation by BBC. BBC reported that the assasination plot was far more complicated then previously thought. It was suggested that the involvement of high ranking British government officials were hidden by British Foreign office until 1997. BBC traced back some links between Sir Reginald Dorman-Smith (an ex governer of Burma) and U Saw - the convicted assassin." - youtube BBC documentary (yes, the opressors make documentaries about the opressor themselves. Look up Machiavellian intelligence on how that is done. Very complicated stuff only for governments. Some call it corruption but Machiavellian plot is more true.)
So is Suu Kyi a double agent who wanted to win her father's battle against The British Empire but in fact she is installing United Nations which in itself is the British Empire or rather The old Roman Empire just evolved. I think so. She then come out of the cradle and into the fight against the oppressors. But hold on. Her father was fighting to get the oppressors out and now Suu Kyi is working to install the oppressors! You see, this is how they operate - double blinded so nobody understands. But she is looking the good part but n fact is a patsy or even a right out agent for The United Nation to install fake democracy so big corporations can move in and loot all minerals and wealth.
In her own words: "... so many people her were looking back to my father as the only hope. So I felt I had a duty to help."
But wait - her father was fighting to get out the ones you are now inviting and your father was assassinated by the British Empire who occupied your country for decades and you studied at Oxford and married an Englishman! You even blood y worked for the United Nations two years. You are a fraud, an imposer, an agent of the Illuminati no less. And why choose democracy which is not democracy but a fake system of oppression. After having studied at Oxford is democracy the only sick system you could come up with.
To make her look as an opponent then the system who overthrew her father kept her in house arrest. But wait, the same system (The British Empire) that overthrew her father she is now installing! In fact they are already there. But to get all people of all of Burma and the whole world to eat the cookie and not know what went on they had to go about and do this triple stunt which at first seems genuine but in fact is planned from day one.
Why not dump her in prison as they would do? Because house arrest is away from prison and in fact she was living in a villa near a very nice lake. Also it is better to "imprisson" her because they she has safety because she is the agent to get in all to go down like clock worlk. Without the plan would fail and it is better to keep her on a very safe distance from anyone who might want to asasinate her. Once the plan succeeded as it has now 2011 then we can "release" her to the public and as a member of government she has total and full protection by the opressors who she ganged up with. Any threat has probably been removed by now so it is safe to install her as president for a governments who killed her father to make a double blindfolded trick.
They call it a Machiavellian plot. She is a proxy and either she is totally stupid and I don't believe she is or she is in on the plot.
Machiavellianism is, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, "the employment of cunning and duplicity in statecraft or in general conduct", deriving from the Italian Renaissance diplomat and writer Niccolò Machiavelli, who wrote Il Principe (The Prince) and other works.
"It ought to be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things."
- Niccolò Machiavelli, The Prince - Machiavellian intelligence.
So Bogyoke Aung San was in high spirits and great friends with the "enemy" the British Empire and Bogyoke Aung San was then to "install" communism and was betrayed and assassinated because then Aung San Suu Kyi could take over as the heiress of the exact same plot to overthrow any indigenous population and all make it look as if Bogyota San Suu and Aung San Suu Kyi were the salvation when in fact they were just tools to install fake democracy elected by the population so the corrupt "new" government can claim it was decided by the people when in fact it was all planned from the very beginning.
In the process Aung San Suu Kyi might have known about all of this - in fact I think she did - and then she sold her soul to the devil. Not to see the same faith as her father she decided to play along and probably struck a deal with the British Empire and later the Illuminati, who are the only ones to deceive such an evil plan, through the United Nations.
"So in other words: you have a plot to illuminate the plot to destroy the ruler who was corrupt because he took what was his from the people who revolted to kill the corrupt so they installed themselves as "kings" and were overthrown by a bigger gun from the west which was drugged to heaven by the eat with opium and money could buy sex and all the wealth but no body stopped for a second to really think. They kept on for years on end and never realized it was all a plot for more, more and more of what? Drugs, sex and money to rule the people to get the wealth and in doing so killing and playing the game of Machiavellian god's made on earth by man to destroy. Good was evil and evil was good in one furious mix... or something like that" - James Luxley
"So the Burmese people to wonder whether they hadn't merely replaced one colonial master with another" - video at 4:35 with regards to the Japaneese occupacion being far worse than the British. Also realize that all invelved had "royal" blood as Churchill (a Spencer) and all the rest like Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma. Lord Mountbatten served in the Royal Navy
"I think, that if my father had lived, democracy would have worked, and it would have lasted. When we lost him [Bogyoke Aung San], we lost our change to build up a happy democratic Burma. But offcause, second changes always come, and we have to grab them while we can" - Aung San Suu Kyi at 8:50
So allegdgely the British killed Bogyoke Aung San and he wanted democracy? But wait. He was one of the founders of Communist Party of Burma - how democratic is that? So here Aung San Suu Kyi is portraying her father as a good guy who wanted democracy but he was killed. Bogyoke overthrew the British Empire and their occupation and he wanted to make a better home/country for Burmeese people without the British rulers and masters. So what do you do with a guy who is not in favour of the british Empire? You try to manouvre him and if he is unwilling then assassinate him and put the blame on U Saw who was overthrown by Bogyoke. And after the British blamed U Saw and arrested him they hung him convicted of the assassination of Bogyoke without any evidense.
If we go back a bit to post World War II in 1946, Bogyoke made an agreement called the Panglong Agreement between the different mountain people and tribes of Burma. All very nice except for one namely the Karen people who was collaborating with the british Empire during British collonialism. But all so far so good. But in July 1947 Bogyoke was assassinated.
In 1961, U Thant, then the Union of Burma's Permanent Representative to the United Nations and former Secretary to the Prime Minister, was elected Secretary-General of the United Nations, a position he held for ten years. Among the Burmese to work at the UN when he was Secretary-General was a young Aung San Suu Kyi, who went on to become winner of the 1991 Nobel Peace Prize.
On 2 March 1962, the military led by General Ne Win took control of Burma through a coup d'état and the government has been under direct or indirect control by the military since then. I truely believe Ne Win realized that the United Nations was getting too close making U Thant Secretary-General of the United Nations
So Bogyoke overthrew the British but was also a friend of them since he visited England (you do not visit a country that occupies you!). Then the British assassinated (or someone did very conveniently) Bogyoke who was suppose to lead the way for democracy according to Aung San Suu Kyi. So now what do we do. Well, after Bogyoke was killed a range of different president was in power until 1962 when the United Nations was getting too close and the students was upset so student rioted at Rangoon University in July 1962 and troops were sent to restore order. They fired on protesters and destroyed the student union building. The student resisted dictatorship (Boudreau, Vincent (2004) Resisting Dictatorship: Repression and Protest in Southeast Asia Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 37-39, 50-51, ISBN 0-521-83989-0) and the dictators were the government who was now in bed with the United Nations.
So enters Aung San Suu Kyi. The daughter of the British Empire's friend (her father) who they sacrificed in the name of clandestine operations. Now to get to the end goal of total control of Burma they use Aung San Suu Kyi to be the new freedom fighter when she in fact is only working for the former British Empire on behalf of her father.
Ne Win installed communism style government and nationalized everything just like Bogyoke wanted communism! Who ho. And the so called socialistic military rule (1962–2011) then had Aung San Suu Kyi under house arrest but they wanted the same thing namely communism and socialism! How strange is that unless you understand the utmost sophistication of this clandestine operation.
When Aung San Suu Kyi says: "But off cause, second changes always come, and we have to grab them while we can" she is not lying. The first so called change was when her father lived but there was something much bigger in the making. Namely the foundation of the United Nations. How can she say "always"? I know there is not always a second change. Yes, sometimes there is. But not always. But in her case the second change is referring to the second coming of implementing a Nation under the United Nations.
Expectedly World War II ended dramatically with a bomb dropped on Hiroshima and Burma could wait. Europe was the bigger target and the creation of the World bank and IMF. With these tools in place Burma would be a peace of cake and meanwhile they would have a "communist" Burma with "military" rule pretending to house arrest Aung San Suu Kyi which was just to keep her out of harm way in case someone who really wanted true freedom would assassinate her. We know now that communism was a tool and a creation of the Jesuits and the Black pope and in essence The Vatican. Communism is nothing more than a tool by the top elite and the "royals" to rule a whole world from east and west with good and bad but it is all in the same family.
Yes, "...second changes always come, and we have to grab them while we can..." and grab is a tiny word to use when you killed many many people! Aung San Suu Kyi is nothing more than a tool of the Illuminati and especially the Rothschild to take Burma and they have all the time in the world to do so because they are totally on top of things. All is just a design issue and fake incidents and assassinations are used to trick people of free lands. Burma is just another country in a long range of countries the United nations shall occupy as countries in Europe was occupied long time ago by the same "bloodline". France, Germany, Italy, Spain... are all the same today bowing under Is Ra El and there Rothschild rules.
Also ask yourself: "Why does Aung San Suu Kyi get sooo much air time on TV when other "freedom fighters" such as the socalled Occupy Movement get little to nothing?" Because Aung San Suu Kyi is part of the end solution and the tool to fool. You my friends are being fooled all over again just like with Hitler etc. Nothing is what it seems Open your eyes or let People sink into the occupation of The Vatican and The Roman Empire - The United Nations". And don't take my word for it:
Matthew 28:19-20 "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen."
And to keep you really entertained: If you look at James Bond "Dr. No" you will notice a lot of red colors and a woman dressing in Asian dress and she is a Caucasian! One of Bond's many conquests! Ian Fleming wrote James Bond. In May 1939 Fleming was recruited by Rear Admiral John Godfrey, Director of Naval Intelligence of the Royal Navy to become Godfrey's personal assistant. Did Ian Fleming base his character James Bond's name on John Stewart Bingley? Well, who knows.
Image: The Ethiobian flag. But hold on... is that not the flag of Burma? Same colors and a star? Sure it is. Just altered a little bit to hide the facts in plain sight.
What!? Are we going to Africa now? Yes. The same flag and colors as Burma. But why? Well, it connect to Queen Bilbas of Sheba. I shall write this up soon because it becomes rather complicated. But please watch the end of this video. The same fake bloodline up though the past 1000 years are trying to conquer all nations and they are doing one hell of a job. Go to Ethiopia or Burma is the same thing - the same rulers.
Please also read the part Descended from Danish King Christian IX here on this page: Wikipedia Denmark content administrated by The State of Denmark
Flag of Third Burmese Empire under Konbaung dynasty (1752–1885) was the depicted flag; white with peacock. This is actually the year of the first Holy Roman Empire. From 1824 it was the British Empire and it has in essense be so ever since just evolving by the laws of Clandestine operations.
In Babylon, Ancient Mesopotamia, the land of Ishtar and ruled by her, she could wonder the Hanging Gardens of Babylon and enjoy Peacocks and many delights. Ishtar is also named Semiramis and Goddess Venus and Isis etc. adopted by the Holy Roman Empire. She has many names - Mary Magdalene is one. She is the mother of all Harlots - in fact the devil herself - according to scripture. She is the one The Roman Holy Empire and The Vatican adore and praise.
David, Melek Taus means King Peacock, and he is the Fallen Peacock Angel King of the Yezidis. However, it's interesting that Wiki (http://cerasius.com/wiki/Melek_Taus) says that peacocks were not native or found in the lands where Melek Taus was 'worshipped'.
I think Melek Taus, the 'Fallen Angel Peacock King', is a mythical character of the Semites that represents Malkuth, which is the last Sephirah (sphere) on the Kabbalah, or Tree of Life. Malkuth means Kingdom. You will see from this image that Malkuth is represented with colors. Same colors used in all Nations flags. Malkuth is at the bottom and is the only "fallen" one and is the only multicolored representing the peacock.
This has all got to do with Kabbalistic astrology also called mazal or mazalot, ("zodiac," "destiny") is a system of astrology based upon the kabbalah. It all stems from the ancient mystery religions and all pagan and heretic and Satanism with devil worship relating to Ishtar.
So in Babylon Ishtar would dance a peacock dance and indeed the peacock is amazing. It is actually called a Peafowl. It is of the Pheasant family. Now we get two words: foul play and peasant. Bird in Danish is fugl and in Latin bird is avis. Fowl = fugl = bird. And from that we get owl. Enter the United Grand Lodge of England which is abbreviated: UGLE. And owl in Danish is UGLE. (pea)fowl = bird = owl.
Melek Taus is talking the creation of earth and the heavens and the beginning of time according to scripture. Ishtar made herself into a god - but a fake god. Nimrod was a terrible monster who ravage the lands and ruled without mercy.
The picture of Melek Taus also forms a circle, sphere or Sephirah. Understand that Ishtar in essence hijacked original religions and the Holy Roman Empire adapted her into The Bible. The Bible speak of good and evil and our governments have chosen evil. This can be seen from the trademarks and logos and flags they use.
This is why there was and is a peafowl in the Burmese flag. They have been there for many many years. Only problem is; how to remove Buddhism? Well, trick people over a few centuries and later decades believing they are installing "new" democracy when in fact it is the same pagan religion being installed through Aung San Suu Kyi to make the people believe that "now, finally, we have freedom". Aung San Suu Kyi is a at best a puppet and she is no Buddhist at heart. She always wares flowers in her hair. Nice. Looks like peafowl feathers? A symbol of Isis who had wings.
Melek translates from Turkish to angle or Latin angelus. The Angles is a modern English term for a Germanic people who took their name from the ancestral cultural region of Angeln. So the peafowl represents the Holy Roman Empire.
Understand that old ancient Myanmar is occupied now and for a long time and that Aung San Suu Kyi is only doing the devil work and she is making it very easy for the devil. Symbols and empirical proof links Aung San Suu Kyi to The Roman Holy Empire.
Ephesians 6:12 "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Page 34 of Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness by late Jim Keith. Click to read at Google Books
There is good and evil and evil is in high places. We see their fruits; wars, famine, abuse, sexual abuse of children in The Vatican, child abductions, worship of Satan through Ishtar's occupation of Babylon etc. But there is also good. But good does not work like the evil people in high places do; they work with terror to keep there grip and power of innocent good people. Myanmar is occupied then and now and if it continues and good people don't wake up then in 100-500 years all will be forgotten and Myanmar will be destroyed and evolve into a new England or a new United Nation which in fact it already is - the evil doer's (Aung San Suu Kyi and The Vatican through the United Nations) just need a little more time to fool a whole people to make it all go down like mothers milk.
The fallen one (Ishtar, Isis, Nimrod, Tammuz - the peacock) has perverted human heritage through Constantine and the Roman Catholic Church.
Yes, The Bible speaks of the bad and evil men and then the good ones. But it so happens that they merged or rather became only evil. But if we dig into our hearts there is good and some parts was written down long time ago. I personally don't want anymore to do with The Bible because it has become so polluted but it is a history book we can learn from to understand our past and present. Perhaps later when people wake up we can overthrow evil but it takes education and real understanding. First then can you be truly safe.
People of Myanmar; please understand that you can be free from occupation and oppressors. It might be too late. They are there now and have had a stronghold of your land for a long time. Soon you will see corporations move in and your culture will slowly vanish over decades and centuries. But it will disappear and merge into the Holy roman Empire fully and totally occupied just like all nations of Europe and elsewhere are occupied already. History repeats itself but you can rewrite history if you wish to do so.
Enter The Lady (2011) a movie about her life and marriage. Aha! Playing with words again such as in The Lady Is A Tramp which is a show tune from the 1937 Rodgers and Hart musical Babes in Arms.
We all know what Democracy stands for now... corruption.
Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness
By Jim Keith
Some things to read on before article final. Return soon to read more.